UK P&I Club Advises on Charterparties in Bills of Lading
The issue of incorporation of charterparties into bills of lading is debated by the English courts on a fairly frequent basis; most recently in the Anna Bo (2015) and the Magellan Spirit (2016) cases. So what’s all the fuss about really and how do you avoid getting caught out?
As with many contracts, an omission of a term will not become apparent (or cause a problem) until something goes wrong – but when it does, it can be very difficult (and expensive) to rectify. This can be seen in the case of the Magellan Spirit, when the owners sought to rely on an exclusive jurisdiction clause in the charterparty (and amend the bill of lading), allowing them an anti-suit injunction against cargo interests in Nigeria. The court held that the bill should not be rectified to incorporate the charterparty jurisdiction clause as there was no relevant continuing common intention capable of supporting a claim for rectification, and the owners were left fighting a US $15.4 million claim in an unfriendly jurisdiction.
- Clearly identify the charterparty on the bill of lading. Most standard short form bills provide a box where you can identify the charterparty by date – ensure it is completed
- Choose your incorporation wording wisely. English law has a number of tests in place to protect the receiver from onerous and/or irrelevant charterparty clauses, so be aware that generally only the terms directly relevant to contract of carriage will be incorporated
- Be aware of conflicts. If there is a discrepancy between your charterparty terms and the bill of lading, then be aware that the clause paramount in the bill will likely override a similar clause in an associated charterparty
The Author
Amanda Hastings is a Claims Executive at UK P&I Club.